Rocky Linux security update in Brocade ASCG 3.4.0c (CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2025-40252)
37830
01 July 2026
01 July 2026
CLOSED
MEDIUM
Varies
CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2025-40252
|
Brocade Security Advisory ID |
BSA-2026-3304 |
|
Component |
Linux Kernel |
|
|
|
Summary
CVE-2025-68724- Title: crypto: asymmetric_keys - prevent overflow in asymmetric_key_generate_id
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: asymmetric_keys - prevent overflow in asymmetric_key_generate_id Use check_add_overflow() to guard against potential integer overflows when adding the binary blob lengths and the size of an asymmetric_key_id structure and return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW) accordingly. This prevents a possible buffer overflow when copying data from potentially malicious X.509 certificate fields that can be arbitrarily large, such as ASN.1 INTEGER serial numbers, issuer names, etc.
CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Base Score: 7.1 HIGH
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVE-2026-23401 - Title: KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when creating an MMIO SPTE
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when creating an MMIO SPTE When installing an emulated MMIO SPTE, do so *after* dropping/zapping the existing SPTE (if it's shadow-present). While commit a54aa15c6bda3 was right about it being impossible to convert a shadow-present SPTE to an MMIO SPTE due to a _guest_ write, it failed to account for writes to guest memory that are outside the scope of KVM. E.g. if host userspace modifies a shadowed gPTE to switch from a memslot to emulted MMIO and then the guest hits a relevant page fault, KVM will install the MMIO SPTE without first zapping the shadow-present SPTE. ------------[ cut here ]------------ is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) WARNING: arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:484 at mark_mmio_spte+0xb2/0xc0 [kvm], CPU#0: vmx_ept_stale_r/4292 Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 4292 Comm: vmx_ept_stale_r Not tainted 7.0.0-rc2-eafebd2d2ab0-sink-vm #319 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:mark_mmio_spte+0xb2/0xc0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> mmu_set_spte+0x237/0x440 [kvm] ept_page_fault+0x535/0x7f0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_do_page_fault+0xee/0x1f0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x8d/0x620 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x18c/0x5a0 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xc55/0x1c20 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2d5/0x980 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xb5/0x730 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x47fa3f </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
CWE-416: Use After Free
Base Score: 8.1 HIGH
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVE-2026-31402 - Title: nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache The NFSv4.0 replay cache uses a fixed 112-byte inline buffer (rp_ibuf[NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE]) to store encoded operation responses. This size was calculated based on OPEN responses and does not account for LOCK denied responses, which include the conflicting lock owner as a variable-length field up to 1024 bytes (NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT). When a LOCK operation is denied due to a conflict with an existing lock that has a large owner, nfsd4_encode_operation() copies the full encoded response into the undersized replay buffer via read_bytes_from_xdr_buf() with no bounds check. This results in a slab-out-of-bounds write of up to 944 bytes past the end of the buffer, corrupting adjacent heap memory. This can be triggered remotely by an unauthenticated attacker with two cooperating NFSv4.0 clients: one sets a lock with a large owner string, then the other requests a conflicting lock to provoke the denial. We could fix this by increasing NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE to allow for a full opaque, but that would increase the size of every stateowner, when most lockowners are not that large. Instead, fix this by checking the encoded response length against NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE before copying into the replay buffer. If the response is too large, set rp_buflen to 0 to skip caching the replay payload. The status is still cached, and the client already received the correct response on the original request.
CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write
Base Score: 9.8 CRITICAL
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVE-2025-40252 - Title: net: qlogic/qede: fix potential out-of-bounds read in qede_tpa_cont() and qede_tpa_end()
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: qlogic/qede: fix potential out-of-bounds read in qede_tpa_cont() and qede_tpa_end() The loops in 'qede_tpa_cont()' and 'qede_tpa_end()', iterate over 'cqe->len_list[]' using only a zero-length terminator as the stopping condition. If the terminator was missing or malformed, the loop could run past the end of the fixed-size array. Add an explicit bound check using ARRAY_SIZE() in both loops to prevent a potential out-of-bounds access. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
CWE-170: Improper Null Termination
Base Score: 4.7 LOW
Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Products Affected
- Brocade ASCG base OS (OVA deployment) before 3.4.0c
Products Confirmed Not Affected
- Brocade SANNav standard deployment
[VEX Justification: Vulnerable_code_not_in_execute_path] - Brocade SANnav base OS (OVA Deployment) before 3.0.0
[VEX Justification: Code_not_present] - Brocade ASCG Standard Deployment
[VEX Justification: Vulnerable_code_not_in_execute_p
Solution
- Security update is provided in Brocade ASCG base OS (OVA Deployment) 3.4.0c
Revision History
|
Version |
Change |
Date |
|
1.0 |
Initial Publication |
7/1/2026 |
Disclaimer
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN AS-IS BASIS SOLELY FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY KIND OF GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN IS BASED ON BROCADE'S CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE VULNERABILITY AND IMPACT TO BROCADE HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PRODUCTS. BROCADE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE OR UPDATE THIS DOCUMENT AT ANY TIME.